jinian: (attack zero)
Actually, James Watson, I still want to kick you in the shins. From a Boing Boing interview about the new edition of The Double Helix, on Rosalind Franklin:

"In this new edition, I notice that Ray [Gosling - her student] has rather a good line in response to my comments about her appearance. He notes that I never saw her dressed up to go out in the evening, and that she had an elegance that I probably never saw."

Oh, maybe she was able to clean up nice after all! Well, never mind then. That is SO IMPORTANT. How about saying, I WAS WRONG TO BE CATTY ABOUT THE APPEARANCE OF AN AWESOME SCIENTIST? Sexist bastard. God knows what his attitude would have been if she'd actually felt like looking attractive at work -- that NEVER goes poorly.
jinian: (clow reads)
From [personal profile] oyceter, with multiple typos fixed.

Books read are bolded, books started and never finished are italicized. (I'm not saying I never do that, but it sure doesn't warrant a text style.) Apparently I already pass everything but the basic requirements pretty excessively. This happens a lot.

Many many books by women! Mostly fantasy. )
jinian: (sharp dressed woman)
Truly weird ad parody: Cloaxia

Announcement and actual Interactive Feminist Bingo Card. (I would actually call this an anti-feminism bingo card; it's the arguments against feminist issues that you may encounter.)

I saw one of these Imagine More Than Marriage stickers on a light pole today, which made me very happy. (Yeah, they don't really have a blog yet, but that's what it looked like.) My state may manage to keep our equal marriage law this November, which would be great, but let's keep dreaming and pushing. Between that and the "sissies rule" graffiti all over the U District, I'm having a pretty affirming vandalism experience lately.

[ETA] Also, Sarah Rees Brennan's Real Lady Sleuths post made me extremely gleeful several times. I recommend it. Also her new book, Unspoken. I didn't care for the Demon's Lexicon books, but this is breezy-funny like her blog writing, Gothic, and centered on a self-proclaimed girl reporter. I admit the half-Japanese main character is named Kami, for which there is no excuse, and that she couldn't resist calling a chapter "Underwater Light." But it also had a romance that completely blindsided me on page 260, which is rare and precious, and there are queer characters. Also psychic kids and magic. Fun and worth the read.
jinian: (queen of cups)
Readercon's apology was actually appropriate, and I am likely to attend in the future to support them.

As per my text from Wim last night, "Holy crap the skycrane actually worked".

(Unrelated but unmissable: Tron prom dress eee!)
jinian: (fft ninja)
Korea's Joseon Dynasty was not so great for women. Despite a history of female shamans, smart-as-a-whip queens, and matrilineal families, Korea turned to Neoconfucianism around 1400 and stuck with a "separate spheres for men and women" rhetoric backed by laws for almost 500 years. Needless to say, the spheres for women were secluded, subservient, and reproductive.

This historical period seems to be a popular setting for dramas in general, possibly because it was just plain long. The drama I watched was Sungkyunkwan Scandal.



This is Kim Yoon Hee. Her brother is too sick to work, and she's a huge (illicit, see Neoconfucianism) nerd, so she dresses as a boy to work as a scribe, then gets embroiled in the university entrance exams and is admitted to a residential program, which was Not The Plan. She gets through this by being absurdly dashing: early on, she gets a reputation as a total stud due to courtesan-related hijinks and swaggers while everyone calls her "Big Shot" for the rest of the series.



This is Moral Rectitude. (Sure, he has a name, but that's not what we called him.) If anything needs judging, he will judge it. Sometimes his own seriousness makes him sad. As he is a rich boy, he has a fat, bawdy servant à la Shakespeare.



These guys are BFFs: the rebellious genius (who is TOTALLY NOT BFFs WITH ANYBODY) and the foppish mastermind (basically a junior Yendi). Both are great.

Because you have likely seen television before, you may be asking: does everyone fall in love with Yoon Hee? Well, yes, pretty much. And they tend to figure out she's a girl (though one should not assume that the loving set and the clued set are identical; sigh in advance over the inevitable OMG AM I GAY crap, but be aware that it goes somewhere hilarious), but they react very differently to this horrifying information. You should watch the show despite the harem aspects, though, because all the main student characters are ridiculous and adorable -- and because of Cho Seon.



Cho Seon is the gisaeng in charge. She gets the best outfits and the best hair and the best clients, and she is a tremendous badass in multiple ways I will not spoil. She is strong, brave, and true in a role that didn't have to be any of that. Absolutely worth watching the show for all by herself.

This drama also gave us a Confucian-scholar harumph that we have gotten considerable use from around the house.

So that was the light-hearted, subverted view of the Joseon Dynasty. The characters are generally on the side of "who cares about this foolish restriction by sex anyway?" We see the danger a few times: her mother's constant and realistic fears, the older men's knowledge that they will have to get Yoon Hee killed if it ever comes out. The thrust of the show, though, is uniformly progressive and plays up the positive aspects of that, sometimes to excess as in the unbelievably happy epilogue.




That's not true at all of Analogue: A Hate Story. The developer, Christine Love, has done other interesting things, like don't take it personally, babe, which is why I was on her mailing list. Analogue's interface is great, with command line, multiple choice answers, and file system navigation all integral to gameplay. (Maybe the initial reasoning for the interface is a little contrived, but I was willing to roll with it.) The subject matter? Disturbing as hell.

You meet a perky AI in a school uniform and find out through her that the dead generation ship you're investigating was living some bastard's fantasy of Joseon-style Neoconfucianism in space. An emperor-captain, noblewomen not allowed to leave their homes, commoners so strictly stratified that we never even see them.

Women aren't supposed to know how to write, but everyone knows they can and there are even traditions which take it as a given; they're just meant to minimize it, not save their correspondence even though it's only electronic text. They do save things, though, and it's largely their archives you're mining to figure out what happened to everyone. Women aren't even supposed to use their personal names for anything, though again they do, and how they do becomes important.

Eventually you'll probably interact with another AI as well, who is much more a product of the era. You can choose to tell her anything you want to about your sex and marital status, as long as your answers are strictly binary; she assumes utter heterosexuality all by herself. She'll react to you very differently based on your answers. She has her own interpretations of the Joseon-style attitudes ranging from affectionate disregard to internalized acceptance. Her judgmental snark is great despite being inevitably myopic.

There's time travel of the saddest kind: a sick person on a one-way trip into a future that is less advanced than where she started, in all kinds of ways.

And it all goes horribly wrong. You know that going in, but not how, and not why you'll empathize with it.

I found it very compelling and didn't stop playing until I'd found all the content. (And all the endings, one of which has to be hacked in a way that's not possible to do without breaking the fourth wall to bits -- I tried all the plausible ones first! -- but winds up very satisfying.) Terrible abuse, though; if you want to know more details I can tell you privately.

I recommend both of these for completely different reasons, but I also recommend them in combination. There's a lot to consider about public and private personae, gender roles, and class in both.
jinian: (Carthamus)
I read her first at Mt. Holyoke, of course. Here is a Lovelace Day sort of poem: "Planetarium".
jinian: (attack zero)
"High heels beat flats: Why I left academia" really managed to annoy me yesterday. As I am still annoyed today, I will kindly share it with you. It's entirely possible that the shoes are a gimmick and the article is really about the author's love for pop culture, and I get that as a device.

The thing is, she makes it sound like academia is the only place that women have to appear a certain way to be taken seriously. It's a problem everywhere, and not just for women although especially severe for us. In the extreme case, one simply cannot get into the goth nightclub without dressing up in a particular way. In the everyday case, I get compliments, smiles, and favors when I dress more femme or even just grow my hair long. Yes, this happens at the university -- though I admit I haven't tried any ridiculous shit like high heels or makeup, so I may not reach academic-frump escape velocity.

And the next layer is, why does the writer like those high heels of hers? Is it (impossibly) completely inherent in her with no social conditioning whatsoever? Is part of what she's saying "I don't want to give up my pretty-girl privilege in the rest of the world"?*

I wanted to wear fabulous high-heel shoes all the time, especially after wearing those boring flat, black boots to the interview, having two professors comment on them, and still not getting the job.

Or is she just saying "I did it wrong and don't want to have to learn another skill set"?

(For bonus points, we can consider why the Princeton Review wanted to publish an article by a woman who likes actual shoes better than she likes the ivory tower.)

* She could wear her heels until she gets to work, then change into sneakers!
jinian: (clow reads)
Lafcadio Hearn, Kwaidan. One of those books that I kept wanting to read until I was actually reluctant to do so, a strange phenomenon. Enjoyable Japanese traditional ghost stories for most of the way through, followed by a few scholarly reflections on themes in Japanese literature, and by themes I mean insects.

Martha Wells, The Serpent Sea. Fine adventurous fantasy in a fun world with fairly believable alien societies. I think the gender roles could be a bit more interesting, but they aren't bog-standard at least.

Jaida Jones and Danielle Bennett, Havemercy. I remain somewhat boggled by a book with two female authors having four main characters who are all men. Two of them have a cute gay romance, but it's still a massive Bechdel fail. The feminine person with the largest number of lines and references is undoubtedly the titular Havemercy, who is a sorcerous clockwork dragon. Others include a vicious shrew (we have stopped being literal here), a whore whose breasts have been insulted, and a foreigner who has consensual sex and is publicly called a whore. If you can get past all that and don't demand a lot of worldbuilding, there's a decent magical mystery and some fun characters in here.

Carrie Vaughn, After the Golden Age. The daughter of two superheroes is a normal human who goes into forensic accounting. Of course, this doesn't mean that she's not involved in major events, and being raised by people with a higher calling is difficult. Clear, engaging writing that goes somewhere rather different than I thought it would (though I called the romance early on).
jinian: (worms' meat)
Everything went fine, except the fucking banquet where there was NO FOOD, only drinks and crowd, so I bailed. Between that and the poster session today I am crashed out. But I ate All The Carbs for dinner (potato soup, triple-decker grilled cheese that came with fries) and feel a bit better.

I have a creeping certainty that I have made ignominious typos during my attempts to use the Ipad instead of hotel interwebs.

Furies of Calderon: why, why, why? I would totally read a book about Amara being awesome, but half of the book thinks it's about the boring boy child, the villains are Boris and Natasha, and complexity is lent to the female characters by rape. Which backstory you find out about in the context of impending more rape with rapey mind-control sauce. Ugh.
jinian: (clow reads)
Originated by [personal profile] james_davis_nicoll, via [personal profile] coffeeandink and [personal profile] gwyneira.

Italicize the authors you've heard of before reading this list of authors, bold the ones you've read at least one work by, underline the ones of whose work you own at least one example of.

Lynn Abbey
Eleanor Arnason
Octavia Butler

Moyra Caldecott
Jayge Carr [corrected spelling]
Joy Chant
Suzy McKee Charnas
C. J. Cherryh
Jo Clayton
Candas Jane Dorsey
Diane Duane

Phyllis Eisenstein
Cynthia Felice

Sheila Finch
Sally Gearhart
Mary Gentle
Dian Girard
Eileen Gunn
Monica Hughes
Diana Wynne Jones

Gwyneth Jones

Leigh Kennedy
Lee Killough
Nancy Kress
Katherine Kurtz
Tanith Lee
Megan Lindholm (AKA Robin Hobb)
Elizabeth A. Lynn

Phillipa Maddern
Ardath Mayhar
Vonda McIntyre
Patricia A. McKillip

Janet Morris
Pat Murphy
Sam Nicholson (AKA Shirley Nikolaisen)
Rachel Pollack
Marta Randall
Anne Rice
Jessica Amanda Salmonson
Pamela Sargent

Sydney J. Van Scyoc
Susan Shwartz
Nancy Springer

Lisa Tuttle
Joan Vinge
Élisabeth Vonarburg
Cherry Wilder
Connie Willis


Well. We have learned that when I see SF by a woman, I read it. I did mention that thing about collecting Women's Press books, right?

(I also learned that DW is persnickety about nesting your tags in the right order.)
jinian: (queen of cups)
Locus obituary

I can't even remember when I first encountered the work of Joanna Russ. It is fair to assume that it may have had something to do with attending Mount Holyoke. I collect books from the Women's Press in a desultory way, so encountered a thing or two that way, and it would have been impossible to care about feminism without at least hearing of How to Suppress Women's Writing and The Female Man.

Once, in a half-width bookstore going out of business, I found a copy of Kittatinny. I don't think I've ever heard anyone else mention it.

Russ interviewed by Delany, Wiscon 30

But the first time she became personally important to me was when I attended Wiscon 30, a thing I did basically to see my friends without realizing how it would affect me. I found that there were feminist elders in the world, real people I could meet, and attending the interview above was a big part of that. How can I explain the sense of connection, of no longer abstract involvement with real other women who care about the same things I did? Even though I'm still standoffish, I feel very different having seen people than I did having only read words.

Sometimes it's right to be angry. Things are fucked up. Bullshit and belittling are real.

People are with you.
jinian: (birdsquee)
From Geek Feminism's latest linkspam (via [personal profile] supergee since I hadn't checked it yet today): Female mad scientists in literature. I may need hard copies of these for my office.
jinian: (Winry kicks ass)
I am so happy to have a new lab assistant who knows what clean looks like. He willingly used acetone (in the fume hood, of course) to clean the gummy adhesive off the test tubes, which have been awful for a year or more. He wanted to. <3! Also I think I am winning the existing lab assistant over to my fan club, if not my lab-perfection ways just yet; he complimented my hair (cue rad-fem rebellion moment), and when he was talking to me about Wolverine today and I proved to actually know a bit more than he did, he carefully sounded me out about other fandoms as well.

It wasn't a bad day for love either, in fact. The interviewee looks like a blonde-bobbed angel and has brains of steel, I was happily surprised to see and sit by one of my favorite year-mates, and a cute postdoc came over to my office after seminar to look at my etchings Macrolichens of the PNW. Also I'm making a care package, which always makes me happy. Whee!
jinian: (tomoyo)
Check out http://awesomeshitwomendid.tumblr.com/ for many and varied snapshots of women rocking.

I'm also a fan of the Wednesday Geek Woman posts at Geek Feminism. They need more submissions right now, too, so show some love for your favorite geek woman by posting a precis in the most recent thread!
jinian: (real scientist)
Lots going on lately that's making me think about women, sexism, and science.

It all started with the Science Cheerleaders. I was surprised at the amount of uncritical happiness I saw about them from feminists, since I had strongly mixed feelings from the first moment of exposure. Over at Blag Hag, I wrote:
"Represents empowerment right now" is exactly where I am on the Science Cheerleaders. Do I think they're making a free choice without social coercion to value and promote their sexiness? Of course not; they're getting literal, monetary compensation for being sexy, and I'm just guessing but there might be some tiny amount of social approbation as well. (Note that I am not saying they're not athletes; their brand of sexiness requires physical prowess.) But I am thrilled to see them, because they're compensating for other social pressures that are leading girls not to develop as the scientists they may want to be because it's considered unsexy, and sexiness is supposed to always be a good and necessary thing for girls. The reinforcement the cheerleaders provide to that idea worries me, but I predict that more critical thinking skills taught to more different people will lead to more questioning and social improvement later.


(I don't agree with much of Jen's very-third-wave original post, but I think my fellow UW grad needs to keep posting as long as the amazing Twisty Faster does, and I liked the discussion that ensued.)

In Science last week there was a review of two books on How Neuromythologies Support Sex Role Stereotypes (link probably requires subscription, sorry). The books are Brain Storm: The Flaws in the Science of Sex Differences by Rebecca M. Jordan-Young and Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference by Cordelia Fine Norton. As usual, when people get started on gender differences, even supposedly impartial scientists can say some idiotic shit, and the books point this out at length. The reviewer, Diane F. Halpern, wrote Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities, which I have not read, and she does maintain that differences exist across cultures:
"Consider the finding that, in more gender-equal societies, females perform as well as males in mathematics (7), much better than males in reading (7), and much worse than males in visuospatial tasks (5). No simple theory, such as the hypothesis that sex differences reflect societal norms or that gender-equal societies will reduce all sex differences, can explain this pattern of results."


Halpern wanted a more balanced view of actual gender-difference science rather than mere mocking of pseudoscience, which is what these books deliver. I admit that I am more likely to read the mocking than I would be to read the balanced view; not only is it more entertaining, but it seems like you have to go too far to get anyone to listen to you at all, see also Richard Dawkins. Balance those scales, authors!

In a fine example of similar mocking, we have Fannie with Breaking: Boys and Girls Are Inherently Different, Except When Boys Prove Worse At Stuff. I particularly like her point that "...while I agree with many societal explanations for such [performance in school] disparities, especially racial ones, I think it's worth noting how rare it is for anyone to say, 'Well, now that girls have been attending school on parity with boys for awhile now, we are seeing that they are actually inherently smarter than boys.'" It's obviously untrue, but does that stop people from saying a bunch of other crazy shit? It does not, and the omission's noteworthy.

Tony Porter's TED talk about getting out of the "man box" (social rules for men) is pretty phenomenal. He owns up to complicity in perpetuating the nasty stuff, complete with creepy rape story, but he's clearly gotten way past it and he's telling people why. I was disappointed to see almost all women in his audience; this is a talk for men to hear.

Late in the game but well worth reading came Sady Doyle's wonderful "Ellen Ripley Saved My Life" (http://www.theawl.com/2010/12/ellen-ripley-saved-my-life). Doyle explicitly ties her own life to those of fictional heroines, and goes a beautiful job of it. I'm grateful that she doesn't fall into the fallacious science-as-villain trap despite noting that institutions are a real problem for these strong women.

links

Apr. 20th, 2010 11:25 am
jinian: (dandy highwayman)
Waiting for the confocal sales reps to finish installing our new motorized stage! Can't really start anything until they're done. Hence, links:

New stuff:
Nawal El Saadawi is made of awesome. http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/apr/15/nawal-el-saadawi-egyptian-feminist

Best friendsfriends find ever: http://bk1e.livejournal.com/259483.html
In which Peter Gabriel covers "Cape Cod Kwassa Kwassa," including the "Peter Gabriel too" lyric -- sort of. If you're not familiar with the song, you will not have the uncontrollable hideous laughter response that I did, but you can hear the original at the bottom of the post. The videos are fun but they do help me see why people don't like Vampire Weekend; it's a lot easier to despise their corn-fed privilege when you can see them. I just listen and am anthropologically interested. Also, bouncy melodies go a long way with me. (Who is the redheaded woman who's a tennis player and a goth enchantress, I wonder?)

Match thread to fabric really well. http://blog.craftzine.com/archive/2010/04/custom_cmyk_sewing_machine_mat.html

Stuff from last month:
New Karate Kid trailer: From coffeeandink. Okay, he is clearly (and textually) learning kung fu, not karate, and a lot of the trailer is "ooh, look, pretty China" -- but there are NO WHITE PEOPLE in this entire 2 minutes 30.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxBQS_Qn5m8

From firecat. The Little Vulcan.
http://ayalesca.dreamwidth.org/1250.html

Badass woman secretary is king of a village in Ghana.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2010/03/09/ST2010030903477.html?sid=ST2010030903477

Cephalopods deceive predators with their ink. (But they look plenty smart!)
http://andrewducker.livejournal.com/1987051.html

Fantagraphics is bringing out wonderful manga!
http://www.fantagraphics.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3956&Itemid=95
jinian: (real scientist)
Last night I volunteered as a Real Scientist at an elementary school science fair in a nearby suburb. The organizer had written to several departments at the U and obtained graduate students, who were motivated by the prospect of official acclaim (see icon). It was incredibly fun, even though at the last minute my year-mate C couldn't make it. Some of the kids were really impressed with us, and it was great fun to ask them the next question implied by their projects.

Loads of images within. )
jinian: (emasculating)
Headline today: Dicks suddenly in line to lead powerful panel

I had two main interpretations:

(1) An unintentionally hilarious visual. Really, the paper needs to keep a twelve-year-old on staff to determine whether at least the front-page above-fold headlines pass the snicker test. (It had been hastily changed by the time I looked at their web site.)

And (2), a little more figuratively, an illustration of patriarchy as usual. In actuality, of course, it referred to local politician Norm Dicks.

It reminded me of another recent instance of patriarchy as usual that also involved Dick's. I hesitated to post about this one, because I wasn't sure I could convey the menace through the funny, and it's definitely funny. But I'll give it a try.

Street harassment )
So here's what I was not: Young. Dressed in sexualized, or even really gendered, clothing. In any kind of social situation. And it still happened, and it was still threatening even through the humor. FYI.
jinian: (Winry kicks ass)
I absolutely love that Iranian men are wearing headscarves in protest against their government and against women's being required to. The story goes that protester Majid Tavakoli was arrested and photos (which may have been doctored) of him in a chador appeared in the media afterward. And then men came out of the woodwork to put photos on the web of them wearing their moms' flowered headscarves and such.

Professor Hamid Dabashi made me want to cry a little by saying: "They (Iranian government officials) use a standard cliche to try to humiliate men, as if being a woman were something bad, and thousands of Iranians respond by posting these pictures, showing there is absolutely nothing wrong with women or veiling..." THANK YOU!

Profile

jinian

May 2013

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
56 78910 11
1213 14 15161718
19 202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 21st, 2013 07:22 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios